Some new evolution textbook stickers–

Filed under: — Joe @ 10:37 pm

The real stickerI’m sure that most of us have heard about this sticker that (with some very devious and dishonest reasoning) the Cobb County school district has decided to put on their Biology textbooks. It’s a very bad move, suggesting to students that evolution is somehow questionable, or unreliable, or different from all the rest of the science (cells, atoms, gravity) they will be learning. The move, of course, was generated by the Intelligent Design movement, the “creationism in a lab coat” subterfuge currently being attempted since creationism itself can not be taught in public schools. Intelligent Design has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked, and it does not belong in science classes (although the history and development of this anti-evolution movement, as well as its philosophical and religious roots, would make a great subject for a class in American History, History of Religion, Cultural Studies, Sociology, Anthropology, etc.)

Gravity is a theoryBut how to combat this kind of thing? How to make the point so clear that it can’t be missed? Well, Colin Purrington (an associate professor of evolutionary biology at Swarthmore–I’ve never met the man, but I’m a big admirer!) Has come up with a brilliant sheet of alternative stickers (see just one of my favorites on the right–there are about ten more, and some of them are even funnier). You can bet that right after Thanksgiving, when Staples is open again, I’m going to be buying me some sticker paper. These just beg to be printed. Thanks, Dr. Purrin! And please, everyone, make a donation to the National Center for Science Education today. Our students need all the help they can get.


  1. Hey…. ALL material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered. That’s how we learn and accept, deny or advance to new discoveries!
    But, you knew that…. 🙂

    Comment by cyd — 11/25/2004 @ 10:08 am

  2. But that’s why it’s misleading to single out evolution as the only subject which needs to be approached that way. But you knew that, too, of course! 😉

    Comment by Joe — 11/25/2004 @ 11:15 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

107 queries. 0.475 seconds. Powered by WordPress version 4.9.1
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.